Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 & 3: The NY v Trump case is collapsing
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (5 comments) [29 views]


Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (10 comments) [395 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (6 comments) [109 views]


Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [63 views]


Turley: The "haymaker" in Supreme Court arguments. Chief Justice Roberts. "Openly mocking of DC Circuit."
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 5:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (8 comments) [189 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [423 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [92 views]


Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [37 views]


James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [81 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [644 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Trump's latest argument to the Supreme Court seems a tad desperate
By Curt_Anderson
February 5, 2024 10:30 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

In a nutshell, Trump's legal team is arguing that since Trump is leading in the polls, the Supreme Court should ignore a constitutional amendment, the 14th. That seems like a stretch to expect SCOTUS to bend to the will of popular opinion as determined by polls.

According to polls most Americans want stricter gun controls, even though these proposed gun control measures are at odds with the 2nd Amendment. I cannot imagine SCOTUS undoing the 2nd Amendment or making any other decision based on presumed popular opinion.

Some here think that I have clerked for a Supreme Court justice. I really haven't! But to me, arguing to SCOTUS that current polls are relevant and should be the basis for a decision seems desperate not to mention insulting.

(CNN)Former President Donald Trump on Monday urged the Supreme Court to keep his name on Colorado’s ballot, accusing his challengers of pursuing an “anti-democratic” legal case against him, in the final written argument he’s expected to make before the justices hear oral arguments in the case this week.

“He is the presumptive Republican nominee and the leading candidate for President of the United States,” Trump’s attorneys told the Supreme Court in the brief. “The American people – not courts or election officials – should choose the next President of the United States.”

Cited and related links:

  1. cnn.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Trump's latest argument to the Supreme Court seems a tad desperate":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on February 6, 2024 4:03 am

    pb's Legal Advisors suggest that this is precisely the argument that will resonate with Chief Justice Roberts, understanding what he wants his Court to be.

    Remember how the Supreme Court refused to hear how many dozen cases Trump brought in the aftermath of the 020 election!!!!!?

    Despite your own experience working for the Court in the past, you should know how this works. It's unlikely that this reasoning will be stated in the majority opinion, but Roberts didn't want the Supreme Court to settle the election in 020 and he won't want it to this time around either.

    Ain't!!!!!


  2. by Indy! on February 6, 2024 12:51 pm

    Not sure that's a valid synopsis of what happened in 2020 or that it applies here. The election was already "settled" - the Clowns merely confirmed it was already settled.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Trump's latest argument to the Supreme Court seems a tad desperate"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page